The need for a consistent and appealing brand identity for countries is well documented. Not always can the official state symbols do the job of communicating the Zeitgeist of the country and serving the art, sports, and business communities as relevant endorsement. (See, for example, the case study of Estonia by Interbrand.) Czech Republic's project of its brand identity has been plagued by bad project management, lack of leadership and bad design for years. The current attempt is no better, either. In fact, it only got worse. Aesthetically the Side2 studio has created a very appealing format. Strategically, it is completely flawed. The format promises a great deal of flexibility in application but lacks substance. Correct me if I'm wrong but I still believe that a logo (or visual identity, if you want) is an attempt to capture the core message of a corporation, a country, a NGO... Logo is the first piece of advertising, a simple visual clue, a meme you want your brand to be ...